<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cult of overwork (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/</link>
	<description>Make Yourself and Your Business Happy At Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time and Money &#8212; Infinitely Possible Financial</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-246889</link>
		<dc:creator>Time and Money &#8212; Infinitely Possible Financial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-246889</guid>
		<description>[...] I get to watch a fair number of entrepreneurs work. There&#8217;s a variety of styles are time use and time orientation. But time and again I see a theme emerge. The business owners and entrepreneurs who set reasonable work hours and take time for themselves (including vacations, meditation, relaxation) are consistently more productive, high earners and happier than those who work constantly. In fact, check out Chief Happiness Officer&#8217;s The Cult of overwork. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I get to watch a fair number of entrepreneurs work. There&#8217;s a variety of styles are time use and time orientation. But time and again I see a theme emerge. The business owners and entrepreneurs who set reasonable work hours and take time for themselves (including vacations, meditation, relaxation) are consistently more productive, high earners and happier than those who work constantly. In fact, check out Chief Happiness Officer&#8217;s The Cult of overwork. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stisiomma</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-246492</link>
		<dc:creator>stisiomma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-246492</guid>
		<description>Hi. Very good site! Thanx for it helps me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Very good site! Thanx for it helps me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: transitvans</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-243661</link>
		<dc:creator>transitvans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-243661</guid>
		<description>This is a business economics principle - the company reaches a point where increasing inputs (in this case hours of work) results in a less than proportionate increase in output. In this case, this is so extreme that the extra input actually creates no extra output at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a business economics principle &#8211; the company reaches a point where increasing inputs (in this case hours of work) results in a less than proportionate increase in output. In this case, this is so extreme that the extra input actually creates no extra output at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y dale con el culto al exceso de trabajo 2</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235824</link>
		<dc:creator>Y dale con el culto al exceso de trabajo 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235824</guid>
		<description>[...] Original de Álex  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original de Álex  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y dale con el culto al exceso de trabajo</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235788</link>
		<dc:creator>Y dale con el culto al exceso de trabajo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235788</guid>
		<description>[...] Original de Álex   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original de Álex   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235593</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-235593</guid>
		<description>The scenario outlined by Doug Strain is right out of the Kellogg playbook as written about in this article http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/2962</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scenario outlined by Doug Strain is right out of the Kellogg playbook as written about in this article <a href="http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/2962" rel="nofollow">http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/2962</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Bristow</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-233633</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Bristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-233633</guid>
		<description>Great site and nice posts... I like it very much.  But this post and it&#039;s predecessor I&#039;m not in total agreement with.  You mentioned having hobbies and other things are home.  However, I have struggled to fit in hobbies, even when working 40-50 hour weeks, because they don&#039;t rank high on my priority list, especially when compared to my job.  I took the job I have because it allows me to have an impact (e.g. being a Senator, the President, or whatnot).  More time on the job means more time impacting the world around me, improving as much as I can.  And in the same way public servants have term limits and so often work tremendously hard because they only have said influence for so long, my life also has an expiration date; I don&#039;t know what it is, but I want to use it to its fullest.

Furthermore, I also find that my knowledge &amp; abilities in a given field (and, by relation, the breadth of the &quot;power&quot; I possess to change the world around me), have a better-than-linear (exponential?) relation to the time I invest each week.  In other words, while working 60 hours per week may not provide 1.5 times more output than 40 hours per week, I do find that if I use the extra 20 reading papers and books, learning more about my field, what I can accomplish in my 40 hours is far more than 1.5 times as useful.  So, while I&#039;m &quot;working&quot;, it&#039;s not really &quot;work&quot;, its a hobby; my work and my hobbies are one in the same.

So, in short, I guess you could say that I feel that many people overwork for the wrong reasons, but working hard for the right reasons can be great if it suits you personally.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site and nice posts&#8230; I like it very much.  But this post and it&#8217;s predecessor I&#8217;m not in total agreement with.  You mentioned having hobbies and other things are home.  However, I have struggled to fit in hobbies, even when working 40-50 hour weeks, because they don&#8217;t rank high on my priority list, especially when compared to my job.  I took the job I have because it allows me to have an impact (e.g. being a Senator, the President, or whatnot).  More time on the job means more time impacting the world around me, improving as much as I can.  And in the same way public servants have term limits and so often work tremendously hard because they only have said influence for so long, my life also has an expiration date; I don&#8217;t know what it is, but I want to use it to its fullest.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I also find that my knowledge &amp; abilities in a given field (and, by relation, the breadth of the &#8220;power&#8221; I possess to change the world around me), have a better-than-linear (exponential?) relation to the time I invest each week.  In other words, while working 60 hours per week may not provide 1.5 times more output than 40 hours per week, I do find that if I use the extra 20 reading papers and books, learning more about my field, what I can accomplish in my 40 hours is far more than 1.5 times as useful.  So, while I&#8217;m &#8220;working&#8221;, it&#8217;s not really &#8220;work&#8221;, its a hobby; my work and my hobbies are one in the same.</p>
<p>So, in short, I guess you could say that I feel that many people overwork for the wrong reasons, but working hard for the right reasons can be great if it suits you personally.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Grabowski</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-207840</link>
		<dc:creator>John Grabowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-207840</guid>
		<description>I once worked for an advertising agency that, due to hard times, also cut back from 40 hours to 32.  We also accomplished the same amount of work, and when we went back to 40 there was some grumbling.  So your experience is not unique.

But this goes against the &quot;wisdom&quot; of business &quot;management.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once worked for an advertising agency that, due to hard times, also cut back from 40 hours to 32.  We also accomplished the same amount of work, and when we went back to 40 there was some grumbling.  So your experience is not unique.</p>
<p>But this goes against the &#8220;wisdom&#8221; of business &#8220;management.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squish</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-151994</link>
		<dc:creator>Squish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-151994</guid>
		<description>I agree that this can work in the short run, but have found in my own experience that long-term housekeeping and maintenance of certain programs falls by the wayside.  SOPs get out of date, manuals don&#039;t get updated and corners may get cut.  But my experience was only with one department going part-time, not an entire company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this can work in the short run, but have found in my own experience that long-term housekeeping and maintenance of certain programs falls by the wayside.  SOPs get out of date, manuals don&#8217;t get updated and corners may get cut.  But my experience was only with one department going part-time, not an entire company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umamiblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It's actually a really really stupid idea</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-147429</link>
		<dc:creator>Umamiblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It's actually a really really stupid idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/04/the-cult-of-overwork-again/#comment-147429</guid>
		<description>[...] And he&#8217;s not the only one to start attacking our culture of multitasking. Alexander Kjerulf of Positive Sharing talked about a CNN study into the work and time habits of 12 reasonably well known leaders. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And he&#8217;s not the only one to start attacking our culture of multitasking. Alexander Kjerulf of Positive Sharing talked about a CNN study into the work and time habits of 12 reasonably well known leaders. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

