<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tournament theory &#8211; the worst argument ever for overpaying executives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/</link>
	<description>Make Yourself and Your Business Happy At Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-194556</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-194556</guid>
		<description>JR: I&#039;m not disputing tournament theory - I&#039;m criticizing the use of TT as a way of justifying unfair pay raises for executives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR: I&#8217;m not disputing tournament theory &#8211; I&#8217;m criticizing the use of TT as a way of justifying unfair pay raises for executives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-194522</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-194522</guid>
		<description>you article does not defy the tournament theory, it just point out where you fail to understand the implications of the theory.

For instance, the theory doesn&#039;t say that chances of moving up in the company depend mostly on luck. It says that there is a force that prevents people from being promoted strictly on basis of their relative performance (to coworkers), and this force is the error term which we call &quot;luck&quot;, but you could also cal it static. It is a factor that prevents us from observing actual performance and effort by the worker, and it exists in nearly all companies.

Furthermore, this theory wasn&#039;t invented to push a salary scheme that greatly rewards CEOs, but this theory was merely trying to explain why in the real world, many companies have such a highly skewed salary/bonus distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you article does not defy the tournament theory, it just point out where you fail to understand the implications of the theory.</p>
<p>For instance, the theory doesn&#8217;t say that chances of moving up in the company depend mostly on luck. It says that there is a force that prevents people from being promoted strictly on basis of their relative performance (to coworkers), and this force is the error term which we call &#8220;luck&#8221;, but you could also cal it static. It is a factor that prevents us from observing actual performance and effort by the worker, and it exists in nearly all companies.</p>
<p>Furthermore, this theory wasn&#8217;t invented to push a salary scheme that greatly rewards CEOs, but this theory was merely trying to explain why in the real world, many companies have such a highly skewed salary/bonus distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tdenham</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>Tdenham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>[...] I then take his pictures and mangle them utterly using my -ahem- meagre graphics skills and the excellent open source program The Gimp. Here are some of the results: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I then take his pictures and mangle them utterly using my -ahem- meagre graphics skills and the excellent open source program The Gimp. Here are some of the results: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reddit made my blog a hit</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator>Reddit made my blog a hit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>[...] Tournament theory - The worst argument ever for overpaying executives [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tournament theory &#8211; The worst argument ever for overpaying executives [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Zen</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>Very good article, I posted a comment to it over the Innovation Zen site.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article, I posted a comment to it over the Innovation Zen site.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overpaying Executives?</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>Overpaying Executives?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2923</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are many controversies regarding executive salaries within companies. Over the years different people have proposed different theories to solve the problem. How much should they earn? Upon what variables should the salary be based? There is an interesting article over the Chief Happiness Officer blog title â€śThe worst argument ever for overpaying executivesâ€? which aims to answer some of these questions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>I agree Neil, this whole argument makes very little sense.

The physicist Wolfgang Pauli once commented on a bad science paper that &quot;This isn&#039;t right. It&#039;s not even wrong&quot;. That&#039;s how I feel about this entire argument :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Neil, this whole argument makes very little sense.</p>
<p>The physicist Wolfgang Pauli once commented on a bad science paper that &#8220;This isn&#8217;t right. It&#8217;s not even wrong&#8221;. That&#8217;s how I feel about this entire argument :o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>&quot;Trying to encourage performance through, say, stock options would unnecessarily expose workers to risks without really encouraging them to work harder.&quot;

Huh?  Does this guy understand stock options?  There is no downside risk with stock options.  The stock goes up, you exercise and win.  The stock goes down, you don&#039;t exercise.

Now that I think about it though, maybe they mean it&#039;s less risky to just pay employees a salary rather than give them options that may not be exercised.  Ah well.  Way to debunk this theory anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Trying to encourage performance through, say, stock options would unnecessarily expose workers to risks without really encouraging them to work harder.&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  Does this guy understand stock options?  There is no downside risk with stock options.  The stock goes up, you exercise and win.  The stock goes down, you don&#8217;t exercise.</p>
<p>Now that I think about it though, maybe they mean it&#8217;s less risky to just pay employees a salary rather than give them options that may not be exercised.  Ah well.  Way to debunk this theory anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip on the article Jach!

And &quot;people donâ€™t work if youâ€™re not constantly kicking their ass&quot; goes in my upcoming post on 5 more business maxims that need to go. Thanks again!

I think you&#039;re exactly right that to some, kicking people&#039;s ass seems easier - maybe because that&#039;s what they&#039;ve always done (or others have done to them). Making people happier at work is definitely easier - and better for business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip on the article Jach!</p>
<p>And &#8220;people donâ€™t work if youâ€™re not constantly kicking their ass&#8221; goes in my upcoming post on 5 more business maxims that need to go. Thanks again!</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re exactly right that to some, kicking people&#8217;s ass seems easier &#8211; maybe because that&#8217;s what they&#8217;ve always done (or others have done to them). Making people happier at work is definitely easier &#8211; and better for business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACH</title>
		<link>http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>JACH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://positivesharing.com/2006/08/overpaid-executives/#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you talked about this topic (I know I pointed it out first, but as I told you before, I don&#039;t agree with it ;).

There are many &quot;corporate wisdom&quot; phrases that seem more like a justification to how thinks are done than a real explanation. Here&#039;s the last one I heard from a guy that has been manager for 20 years: &quot;people don&#039;t work if you&#039;re not constantly kicking their ass&quot;.

Of course, it seems &quot;easier&quot; to kick people&#039;s ass than creating a culture when everyone ENJOY their job and consequently DO their job. It &quot;seems&quot; easier, but I think is not. To create a great environment you have to invest a lot of energy, change people&#039;s mentality and create a commitment to happiness in the company, but then everything will go on smoothly. In the other case, you&#039;ll have to &quot;kick people&#039;s ass&quot; forever. Well... not forever. Just until they quit, or either the kicked or the kicker dies, whatever comes first :P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you talked about this topic (I know I pointed it out first, but as I told you before, I don&#8217;t agree with it ;).</p>
<p>There are many &#8220;corporate wisdom&#8221; phrases that seem more like a justification to how thinks are done than a real explanation. Here&#8217;s the last one I heard from a guy that has been manager for 20 years: &#8220;people don&#8217;t work if you&#8217;re not constantly kicking their ass&#8221;.</p>
<p>Of course, it seems &#8220;easier&#8221; to kick people&#8217;s ass than creating a culture when everyone ENJOY their job and consequently DO their job. It &#8220;seems&#8221; easier, but I think is not. To create a great environment you have to invest a lot of energy, change people&#8217;s mentality and create a commitment to happiness in the company, but then everything will go on smoothly. In the other case, you&#8217;ll have to &#8220;kick people&#8217;s ass&#8221; forever. Well&#8230; not forever. Just until they quit, or either the kicked or the kicker dies, whatever comes first :P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

