Category: Politics

Democracy and how we govern

  • 6 Reasons Why Greeces New 6-day Work Week Will BACKFIRE

    6 Reasons Why Greeces New 6-day Work Week Will BACKFIRE

    So Greece has decided to buck the trend in the rest of the world and make the work week LONGER for many workers. The law just went into effect this month and it is a spectacularly bad idea that WILL backfire in the worst possible way. And in this article I’m going to prove it with science!

    What does the law say / not say

    But first – what does the new law actually say and why are they passing it?

    Greek companies can now compel employees to work more hours. It’s been widely reported as a move to a 6-day workweek, but in reality some workers will have to either work 6 8-hour days OR an extra 2 hours a day 5 days a week. Each of these options will take the workweek from 40 to 48 hours. In return they get a 40% wage increase for the extra hours and more for working Sundays. The law doesn’t apply in all workplaces, only in private companies that operate around the clock in shifts and which are facing labor shortages.

    The pro-business Greek government believes this law will boost the economy by addressing a lack of skilled employees. Of course many other countries are facing similar challenges due to falling birthrates and other factors, so it’s tempting to assume that we can make up for a lack of workers by making existing workers work more hours.

    And indeed, many countries and workplaces are itching to make people work more. For instance, here in Denmark, the government just canceled one of our beloved annual public holidays because – they claim – we need to boost productivity to counter the threat posed by Putin and Russia. I’m sure Putin is just quaking with fear now that Danes will have to work one more day every year.

    In reality, research clearly shows that increasing working hours is going to have the opposite effect and hurt the economy! Here are 6 reasons why.

    1: Lower output

    First of all – let’s make this very clear: Greek companies will not be any more productive or profitable with a 6-day workweek.

    Why not? It really isn’t a big mystery: When employees work more hours they get more tired, They lose cognitive capacity which means that overworked people:

    • Are less productive

    • Are less creative

    • Make worse decisions

    • Make more mistakes.

    Studies even show that overwork makes you dumber. A study of British government workers found that those who worked longer hours scored lower on various cognitive tests than their coworkers who worked 40 hours a week.

    It’s important to make a clear distinction between PRODUCTIVITY and OUTPUT. Output is how much work a given person or team or company completes. A certain number of widgets produced in a factory or lines of code written in a tech company, for instance. Productivity on the other hand is output per hour worked, so how much gets produced per hour worked by employees.

    For instance: If a car factory with 1000 employees makes 80 cars in an 8-hour shift, their output that day is 800 and their productivity is .01 car per man-hour.

    Now, many people accept that a person who works 60 hours a week will probably be less PRODUCTIVE than one working 40. They intuitively get that the last 20 hours are probably going to be less effective than the first 40.

    I asked about this on LinkedIn and people understand that. Only 17% believed that more working hours would lead to higher output.

    That’s the good news. The bad news is that only 37% got the correct answer: that productivity actually drops so much for people working more than 50 hours a week – for all of the reasons we just saw – that their total OUTPUT is lower – not just their PRODUCTIVITY. This is true for both factory workers and knowledge workers. It’s not just a matter of diminishing returns on the extra hours – there’s a negative return on those hours and the company is overall LESS profitable.

    This is not a new discovery. Back in world war 1 the British army needed as much ammunition as possible, so they desperately wanted to maximize the output of their munitions factories. So obviously they made workers work more – up to 90 hours a week. When that mysteriously didn’t work, they started gathering data connecting working hours to output and found something very curious.

    This graph shows actual output (not productivity) vs. hours worked for two groups of women workers doing two different kinds of tasks. As you can see, beyond a certain number of hours – in this case 51 a week – working more hours did not increase output. Every hour worked after that was essentially wasted. We have known this since 1917.

    This effect has been found again and again in many different studies from both factory settings and office-type knowledge work.

    Granted, Greece isn’t moving workers to a 90-hour work week but only 48 hours every week, but the data shows very clearly that a 20% increase in hours will NOT lead to a 20% increase in production.

    This new law is extra ironic because Greece already has the longest working hours per worker of any European country and 7th highest in the OECD.

    So if Greece is hoping that companies will be overall more profitable and therefore boost the economy, the data shows the exact opposite – this will lead to lower productivity and output among Greek businesses.

    2: More illness

    So overwork is bad for the workplace – but it’s even worse for employees. Studies show that permanent overwork is connected with a long list of mental and physical health problems including strokes, depression, alcoholism, diabetes and heart disease.

    This is not just bad for the individual, it’s also going to hurt Greek workplaces. If the problem they’re seeking to address is a lack of qualified workers, you don’t want your current workers to get sick and miss a ton of work.

    And of course more illness among workers will also hurt the Greek economy because it will increase healthcare costs.

    3: More workplace injuries

    Also, a longer work week will lead to more workplace accidents. Research shows that an increase in normal hours worked increases injury risk because workers are more fatigued.

    This is especially relevant for Greece because most of the workplaces that can extend hours under this new law will probably be in manufacturing.

    4: Worse work-life balance and more burnout

    This is so obvious that you hardly need to say it but if you’re working 6 days a week, your work-life balance is going to suffer. You’ll have less time for your family, your friends, your children, your partner, your hobbies and everything else in your life.

    Research clearly shows that longer working hours lead to:

    • Impaired sleep

    • Job stress and burnout

    • Worse partner relationships

    • Worse family relationships

    • Lower life satisfaction

    • More burnout

    And again, more burnout leads to more workers being absent from work and higher healthcare costs for the country.

    5: More brain drain

    Brain drain has been a huge problem for Greece. The financial crisis hit that country especially hard and the tough economy made hundreds of thousands of mostly young and well-educated people leave and find work in other countries. Authorities estimate that 600,000 young professionals left to work abroad between 2010 and 2021.

    Greece really wants them back. Among other initiatives, the Labor Ministry has created an online platform called Rebrain Greece to help match professionals willing to return home with potential employers.

    But here’s the thing: Given that the younger generations at work tend to value work-life balance, how do you think they’re going to like the prospect of being forced to work 6 days a week’ Imagine you’re a young Greek working in Denmark where the official work week is 37 hours and moving back might mean working 48 instead? Or imagine you’re a young Greek currently working in Greece whose workplace is looking to go to a 6-day workweek. Might this not be exactly the thing that inspires you to find work in a different country?

    If Greece is looking to reverse the brain drain, this is exactly the wrong thing to do.

    6: Unproductive time

    OK, one last problem with Greece’s new law: While people can be forced into the workplace for a longer time, that doesn’t mean they’ll be working productively all the time. Forced overwork leads to a ton of unproductive time where people are at work? but little real work is getting done. This is deeply frustrating for workers because not only is that time taken away from the rest of your life, that time is WASTED and YOU KNOW it’s wasted. Nobody likes to waste time.

    Also, studies show that when the workplace mandates long working hours, people tend to lie about how many hours they work. And managers are easy to fool. One study found that managers couldn’t tell the difference between those of their employees who ACTUALLY worked 80 hours a week and those who just pretended to.

    What should Greece have done instead?

    So my prediction is that this is going to backfire spectacularly for all of these reasons. Companies will be less productive, employees will be more sick leading to higher healthcare costs for the country and more Greeks who are able to will flee the country or stay abroad in countries that have more reasonable working hours.

    What should Greece (and any other country looking to boost the economy) do instead? Well first they could have looked at all the countries that have tested a 4-day work week and found it to work exceptionally well. Like Iceland, where it’s been called an “overwhelming success.”

    They could also have chosen policies that maximize workers’ welfare. Any government has an interest in enacting public policies that strengthen the competitive advantage of companies in that country. However, this is often done by cutting corporate taxes, deregulation or attempts to increase working hours – none of which have much of a track record of success.

    If a government is truly serious about giving companies a sustained, strong competitive advantage, they should really focus on policies that create happier workplaces. This would not only be good for the companies and the employees, it would also be good for the national economy, as it would boost national productivity and reduce absenteeism, stress and related healthcare costs.

    I have an article on 11 policies that nations can implement to create a competitive advantage because happy workers are more productive.

    Another thing Greece could have done that I also mention in that article is invest in training existing workers. The unemployment rate in Greece is over 10% so there are plenty of people without jobs. They may not currently have the skills and competencies that companies are looking for but that’s why you train them.

    But most of all, Greece – and any other country that wants to boost the economy – could have focused on maximizing output and profitability, not hours worked, and realized that those are two very different things. If they had spent just a little time looking at the available research on overwork, they would have realized that a longer work week is actually going to hurt, not help.

    If you want a really good overview on all the reasons long working hours are terrible for workplaces AND employees, I have a video on why that is and how we stop it.

    The one redeeming quality of Greece’s new law

    Just to be clear: I’m not saying that Greece’s new law is completely useless. You see, other countries are already looking at this law and asking if they could do the same. And I have every confidence that when this law inevitably backfires in Greece, that failure will warn any other countries or companies away from trying something similar.

    So I guess we should all thank them for that at least.

    Your take

    What do you think? How much will this law boost the Greek economy? Should other countries follow their lead? What is the optimal length of a work week that will lead to the most output? Write a comment, I’d love to hear your take.

    Video

    If you’d prefer to watch this, I also have a video where I make all the same points:

    A new law just went into effect in Greece that aims to boost the economy by moving workers to a 6-day work week. This law is going to backfire and hurt both the economy and of course the workers and in this video I present to present 6 reasons why.

  • We NEED to break Americas addiction to layoffs!

    We NEED to break Americas addiction to layoffs!

    US companies LOVE layoffs – which is a shame because they hurt not only employees but also the company’s results – according to the research.

    See why layoffs are so bad and how to avoid them – because they’re not inevitable!

  • Americans die younger, so US companies make billions

    Americans die younger, so US companies make billions

    Sometimes you put on your tinfoil hat… and turn out to be right.

    Something so insane came along today that I just had to drop everything else and make this video. I give a little glimpse of how bad the US pension system is because it directly incentivizes companies when their employees die younger. I contrast and compare with the Danish pension system.

    You can also watch my original video about the cult of overwork.

  • Does Musks twitter chaos hide a shady secret?

    Does Musks twitter chaos hide a shady secret?

    Musk first 3 weeks at twitter have been characterized by chaos and cruelty all around. But why? What purpose does the senseless abuse serve?

    In this video I argue that the only way it makes sense, is if Musk is trying to turn twitter into a compliant organization that will go along with anything Musk orders, no matter how shady or illegal.

  • I QUIT! How you get out of a bad job before it’s too late.

    I QUIT! How you get out of a bad job before it’s too late.

    Some people want you to believe that quitting is weak and for losers. They’re lying and we need to normalize leaving jobs that are not good for us.

    In this video we take a deep look at what happens when you’re unhappy at work, how you can know it’s time to quit and how you can support others who need to get away from a bad job.

    Content:

    (00:00​) 1: Frogs aren’t idiots
    (01:01​) 2: Introduction to quitting
    (
    03:45) 3: How hating your job hurts you
    (
    06:56) 4: Exposing the anti-quitting propaganda
    (
    18:05) 5: The excuses people make for not quitting
    (
    27:23) 6: Should you quit?
    (
    32:47) 7: 21 perfectly valid reasons for quitting
    (
    40:21) 8: What if you can’t quit
    (
    46:24) 9: How to quit
    (
    47:39) 10: Should you always find a new job first before you quit?
    (
    49:42) 11: We should celebrate quitters
    (
    59:22) 12: I quit!

    References, articles and books from the video

    Boiling frog experiment video

    Boiling frog myth

    Relationship between a bad job and poor health

    A bad jobs affect sleep

    A bad job makes you gain weight

    A bad job hurts mental health

    Unhappy workers are less productive

    Japanese runner breaks leg

    Effective propaganda exploits existing biases

    Ambiguity effect

    The status quo bias

    Loss aversion

    The endowment effect

    Successful Stanford dropouts

    Emotional contagion

    How Herbalife and other MLMs scam people

    The No Asshole Rule – excellent book by Bob Sutton

    Turing pharmaceuticals raised prices

    Hope theory

    Stories from people who quit without first finding a new jobs

    Apprentice car mechanic commits suicide after being bullied

    Steve Ballmer throws a chair

    The most basic freedom is the freedom to quit

    The true cost of employee turnover

    Bosses try to predict who will quit

    Related posts

     

  • Having fun with politics

    Don’t worry if you don’t understand a word he says – it’s still hilarious to watch this Swiss member of parliament try to make it through his very serious speech without laughing.

  • 11 government policies that promote happiness at work to give a country a competitive advantage

    11 government policies that promote happiness at work to give a country a competitive advantage

    Discussing public policy in Dubai

    Given that happy companies have significant competitive advantages, governments have a strong interest in enacting public policies that promote happiness at work in their country.

    But what exactly could a government do to achieve this?

    At the World Government Summit in Dubai earlier this month I was part of a panel that discussed how public policy could promote workplace happiness.

    We had  a fascinating and wide-ranging discussion and came up with many cool ideas. Some of these may seem radical or weird but many of them are already in place in countries around the world.

    Here are 11 ideas I would suggest:

    1: Regulate and inspect psychological workplace safety

    Pretty much every country has a government agency that sets requirements for physical workplace safety and sends out inspectors to visit e.g. factories and construction sites to make sure that the correct safety equipment is being used and that workers are following safety regulations.

    So why not do the same for psychological workplace safety?

    In the Scandinavian countries, this is actually in place. The Working Environment Authorities conduct inspections in cases where they suspect that working conditions are psychologically unsafe. They inspect things like:

    • Amount of work and time pressure
    • High emotional costs of labor
    • Bullying and sexual harassment
    • Contradictory or unclear work requirements

    If they find that the workplace is psychologically unsafe they can issue orders that the company must follow. In serious cases they can even issue fines.

    Breaking a leg because you trip over something at work is painful and can take a long time to heal. But make no mistake about it: being bullied by your boss or working under constant stress can affect your mental and physical health just as severely.

    Therefore it makes perfect sense to mandate standards for psychological workplace safety and inspect workplaces to make sure they’re followed.

    2: Regulate against permanent overwork

    In Denmark, we have laws protecting employees from permanent overwork. The result is that Danes tend to leave work at a reasonable hour most days, and they also get five to six weeks of vacation per year, several national holidays and up to a year of paid maternity/paternity leave. While the average American works 1,790 hours per year, the average Dane only works 1,450.

    Even Japan where the culture of overwork is so rampant that they have a word called karoshi that means death from overwork, is trying to enact similar laws:

    The law, introduced as a response to the social problem that has been serious since the late 1980s, makes it the state’s responsibility to take steps to prevent death from overwork. It calls on the government to study the situation of heavy workloads that impair the health of company workers and lead them to take their own life.

    Protecting employees from permanent overwork makes them happier and more productive.

    3: Mandate employee representation on board of directors

    Here’s another idea from Scandinavia – give employees representation on the board of directors:

    Employees in Danish companies employing 35 employees or more, are entitled to elect a number of representatives to the board of directors. The number elected by employees should correspond to half the number elected by those who own the company at the general meeting, and should be at least two.

    Crucially these employee representatives are not mere observers – they have all the same powers and responsibilities as the “regular” board members.

    This means that employees are informed about and have influence on major strategic decisions.

    4: Make government workplaces role models

    I would love to see governments take a leading role by making public sector workplaces among the best in the country.

    Sadly, the public sector usually has a bit of an inferiority complex. Since they usually can’t offer the same salaries, perks and incentives as private sector workplaces, they feel that they can’t be as good workplaces.

    However, it turns out that those factors matter very little for workplace happiness, as long as they’re fair. However, public sector workplaces have a huge potential for being happy because they can offer something that many private workplaces struggle to give their employees: Meaningful work.

    Public organizations almost by definition work for an important purpose. Schools educate children, hospitals heal the sick, city planners create better and more liveable cities - even the garbage men play a huge role in making people’s lives easier and better.

    By contrast, let’s say  you work in an ad agency. The end result of your hard work might be that some company somewhere sells a fraction more detergent. Is that really meaningful to you?

    If public sector workplaces would take the lead on offering their employees things like meaningful work, great leadership, good working conditions, work/life balance, professional development and employee empowerment they could serve as role models for all workplaces.

    5: Promote lifelong learning

    When a government makes education available cheap or free to its citizens, there is a much bigger chance that they get to realize their full potential and become happy at work.

    And this should not be limited to young people. Lifelong learning should make it easy and affordable for anyone to upgrade their skills so they can get different or more interesting work.

    6: Require companies to measure and report on employee happiness

    Pretty much all countries require strict financial reporting from companies.

    So why not require companies to measure and report on employee happiness?

    7: Require all government suppliers to be certified happy workplaces

    The government of any nation buys huge amounts of goods and services from private sector companies.

    No government should knowingly buy from a company that used slave labor or child labor or polluted the environment.

    So why not require that all government suppliers be good workplaces?

    8: Don’t hobble trade unions

    Trade unions have a somewhat mixed reputation and can fall victim to corruption or cronyism.

    However, on the whole it is clear from the research that collective bargaining is a powerful tool to improve working conditions not just for union members but for all workers in many areas including compensation, vacation time, maternity/paternity leave and workplace safety.

    Employers and lobbyists in some countries are trying to restrict unions, making it easier for employers to keep costs low. If a government protects workers’ rights to organize, the result is better working conditions and happier workplaces.

    9: Celebrate the best workplaces

    Several private companies conduct surveys to find the best workplaces in different countries, but these rankings are always limited to those workplaces that pay to be included. This limits their usefulness.

    So why not let the state publish a ranking of the best workplaces in the country?

    10: Make unemployment benefits widely available and liveable

    When unemployment benefits are too low to live on or too hard to obtain, employees are locked in to their jobs, because leaving a bad workplace could have disastrous financial consequences.

    However, when unemployment benefits support a decent standard of living and are available also to people who quit a job, getting away from a toxic workplace is much easier.

    11: Make bad workplaces and managers legally responsible for the harm they cause

    If a workplace is run in a way that systematically harms its employees mental health, causing stress and depression, it should be possible to hold the leadership of that company legally accountable.

    We already do this for workplaces that don’t live up to physical workplace safety regulations – serious violations can lead to fines or even jail time for the managers responsible.

    I think it makes perfect sense to do the same for companies or managers that harm their employees mental health.

    The point

    Any government has an interest in enacting public policies that strengthen the competitive advantage of companies in that country.

    However, this is often done by cutting corporate taxes, deregulation or corporate subsidies – none of which have much of a track record of success.

    If a government is truly serious about giving companies a sustained, strong competitive advantage, they should really focus on policies that create happier workplaces.

    This would not only be good for the companies and the employees, it would also be good for the national economy, as it would boost national productivity and reduce absenteeism, stress and related healthcare costs.

  • Shouldn’t your country have a happiness minister?


    The UAE’s minister for happiness opens the conference.

    I am back from Dubai where I spent 3 days at the World Government Summit along with 4,000 other delegates.

    One theme running through the entire event was how government policies can further the happiness of citizens. I was invited to participate as an expert in happiness at work.

    And the event was REALLY fascinating. They had many of the biggest names in the field come and speak, including Ed Diener, Sir Richard Layard, Jeffrey Sachs and the prime minister of Bhutan where they have been focusing the country’s development on happiness for the last 15-20 years.

    Here I am with Sir Richard Layard:

    The closing speakers were the economist Joseph Stiglitz and Elon Musk.

    I am hugely impressed with the scope of the event and also with the consistent focus on how governments can focus on the wellbeing of their citizens, rather than just on economic growth. I think this is a fascinating vision for the future of public policy making.

    And the two are not the same. It is entirely possible to create economic growth in a way that does not make people any happier. Here is a graph showing how GDP per capita grew consistently over a 30-year period in the UK while life satisfaction stayed flat:

    So shouldn’t your country have a happiness minister? I wish mine did!

  • Job lock vs. flexicurity. What would you prefer?

    Health Care

    I rarely go into politics or public policy on this blog, but I’m going to make an exeption today.

    I’ve been following the US debate on health care pretty closely and the biggest issue currently in play is whether or not the US government should offer health care in addition to the private insurance companies.

    In the current US system, where there is no so-called public option, many people have health insurance through their workplace and this system has one serious often overlooked drawback, namely job lock:

    Millions of Americans are in what’s called “job lock.” They can’t leave their jobs because they feel they can’t get the same health insurance benefits on their own or at the next job.

    A new poll by NPR News, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government shows that one out of four Americans has experienced job lock, in the last couple of years, or someone in their immediate family has. That’s despite legislation enacted six years ago to deal with the problem

    In other words, you may hate your job but if you quit you and your family no longer have health insurance. This article looks at job lock in detail.

    In Denmark on the other hand, we have pretty much the exact opposite: Health care is public and paid for through our taxes. In addition, Denmark has a unique labor market approach called flexicurity.

    Flexicurity means that on one hand it’s easy for companies to fire employees but on the other hand, you get very generous unemployment benefits, ie. 90% of your salary.

    The drawback to this system is obvious: Very high taxes.

    The advantages are many, though. First of all, the Danish economy has been doing very well. Even now, during the financial crisis, we’re doing better than most of Europe and unemployment is still below 5%.

    From a standpoint of happiness at work, there is no doubt that the Danish system is best. When it’s easy and safe to quit a job there is much less risk in leaving a job you hate. Even if you choose not to quit, just knowing that you could makes things more bearable. Hating you job AND knowing that you can’t quit makes everything worse.

    Even the fact that it’s easy to fire people increases happiness at work. Seriously! It means that companies can fire employees who don’t perform well or who don’t fit in.

    In countries with very strong labour protection laws, it can be almost impossible to fire anyone – meaning that underperforming employees stay in their jobs and everyone else has to pick up the slack. Also, remember that unhappiness at work is highly contagious, so one unhappy employee can easily drag down the whole department.

    So in my opinion (and I am NOT an economist, so take this with a grain of salt) the flexicurity model makes Danes happier at work – and as I’ve previously mentioned happy workplaces are more productive, innovative and profitable.

    The American model on the other hand, makes people less happy at work and thus decreases productivity.

    Your take

    What do you think? Have you ever experienced job lock? What advantages or drawbacks can you see to the US or the Danish model?

    Related posts

  • Quote

    I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.

    – Thomas Jefferson