Category: Philosophy

Warning: Deep thoughts ahead.

  • Should you seek passion or duty at work? (Pssst: The answer is passion).

    Should you seek passion or duty at work? (Pssst: The answer is passion).

    In an opinion pice in the New York Times, professor Firmin DeBrabrander argues that you should not approach work as your passion but as your duty. Looking for passion at work, he says, will make you stressed and is bound to fail anyway.

    I think that’s complete nonsense! I know – what a shocker :) But worst of all it’s poorly reasoned nonsense that relies on a string of terrible arguments and deliberate ignorance of the research in the field.

    Here are the top 5 fails from DeBrarander’s article and why you should most definitely seek work you’re passionate about.

    1: He blames the long US working hours on people’s passion for their jobs

    The United States offers a curious paradox: Though the standard of living has risen, and creature comforts are more readily and easily available — and though technological innovations have made it easier to work efficiently — people work more, not less.

    Why is this?

    One theory is that Americans have come to expect work to be a source of meaning in their lives.

    There are no studies showing that people who find work meaningful work more hours than those who don’t.

    If you want to actually know why working hours are still on the rise in the US, I think it makes much more sense to look at some of these factors:

    • Bad management practices
    • Workplace cultural norms
    • Economic insecurity caused by a hugely challenged middle class that are one pay check away from financial disaster.
    • The  high cost of college educations and the huge amount of debt that many young people graduate with – meaning that they absolutely must work or face personal bankruptcy.

    Put people with huge financial insecurity in a workplace that expects and demands 60, 70 or 80-hour work weeks, and they most often have no option but to go along and work themselves to death.

    2: Being passionate about your work means that you experience constant bliss

    Most people are certainly guaranteed to fail in this pursuit [of passion at work]. Even people who love their jobs will report they must do thankless tasks from time to time. Few, if any, experience nonstop bliss, where sheer passion sustains them through long hours on the job.

    Notice what DeBrabrander did there? He just redefined being passionate about your work to mean that you experience nonstop bliss and sheer sustained passion.

    This is what’s  known as a strawman argument, where you exaggerate, misrepresent, or just completely fabricate someone’s position, to make it easier to attack.

    Just to be clear: Being passionate about your job does not mean that you experience nonstop bliss. Everyone has bad days at work – and that’s perfectly OK. And of course every job contains a mix of tasks that you enjoy and tasks that suck – and that’s OK too.

    3: Young people burn out because they seek passion at work

    There is plenty of evidence that our high-octane work culture has serious consequences. It is at least partly responsible for high levels of burnout among millennials.

    This is an especially bad argument because studies show that people who find meaning at work experience less stress and burnout.

    And while there definitely is an increase of stress, burnout, depression and mental problems among young people,  it’s intellectually lazy to just conclude that it’s caused mainly – or even partly – by their search for passion and meaning at work.

    Young people are also facing many other pressures, including a global climate disaster that no one is doing much about, while they are of course the ones who will have to live with the consequences of that inaction. Might that be a source of stress for them? No, says DeBrabrande – their real problem is that they expect their jobs to be meaningful.

    4: If you seek passion in your work, you will fail

    A recent study of priorities among young people found that achieving one’s career passion ranks highest of all… Finding a fulfilling job is almost three times more important than having a family, teenagers in the study reported.

    It is daunting to contemplate. Most people are certainly guaranteed to fail in this pursuit.

    Got that? If you seek passion at work, you are almost guaranteed to fail. Really? How would he know? Of course, he’s previously redefined passion at work to mean constant bliss and if that’s your goal, of course you will fail.

    And just to make it worse, the study he links to in support of his claim is not even about passion at work. The actual finding is that 95% of US teenagers surveyed say that “having a job or career they enjoy” is important to them.

    5: Passion means that work is the ONLY source of meaning in your life

    We might begin by rejecting the notion that work should consume our lives, define and give meaning to them…

    Again, the article dishonestly redefines passion to mean that work consumes your life and gives meaning to it.

    In reality, passion for your job simply means that you are passionate about the work you do – not that it’s the only thing are passionate about.

    In fact, studies show that people who are passionate about their work are happier and more active outside of work as well.

    Why you absolutely should seek work you’re passionate about

    This kind of attack on happiness at work is nothing new. Many serious people are coming out of the woodwork to declare that happiness at work is stupid, impossible, naïve, silly, manipulative and/or bad for you. In the video above we cover their 20 most used objections to workplace happiness and why they’re wrong.

    DeBrabrander’s analysis is poorly argued and of course also wrong. Everyone should absolutely seek work they’re passionate about. There are many reasons why, but the most important are these:

    • It will make you happier at work
    • It will make you happier in life
    • It will make you more successful at work
    • It will protect you from doing harmful work – whereas not trying to find meaning at work makes it more likely that you will end up doing work that exploits or harms others
    • Work is where you will spend many of your waking hours – of course you should spend that time doing something you care about
    • Work is where you will invest most of your energy, skills and competencies – all of that effort should be invested in the service of a cause you care about

    Paradoxically, I actually think DeBrabrander agrees! When he talks about approaching work as duty rather than passion, he bases this on an understanding of duty that comes from stoic philosophy. I have many, many issues with stoic philosophy – not least that it is based on the idea that we are all subjects to a predetermined fate – but it has recently become very fashionable, especially among silicon valley tech bros.

    In the NYTimes pice, DrBrabrander recounts The advice of Seneca, one of the most prominent stoics to define duty like this:

    Seneca’s advice to Serenus is to focus on doing his duty. He must perform the job he is best disposed and able to perform, as determined by his nature, and the needs of those around him. And he must forget about glory or thrill or personal fulfillment — at least in the near term. If he performs his duty, Seneca explains, fulfillment will come as a matter of course.

    Duty, in this definition, is not just about having a “Shut up and do your job” approach. It’s about doing work that you’re good at and which meets the needs of those around you.

    BUT THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT MEANINGFUL WORK IS!

    If DeBrabrander had been the tiniest bit curious about the research in this field, he would have found that this is precisely how Amy Wrezniewski and others define the “calling” approach to work:

    In the “calling” orientation, people are working not for career advancement or for financial gain, but instead for the fulfilment or the meaning that the work itself brings to the individual. People who see their work more as a calling see the work as an end in itself that is deeply fulfilling and regardless of the kind of work they’re doing, they tend to see the work as having a societal benefit.

    It’s ultimately about working for something bigger than yourself.

    The upshot

    This opinion piece is poorly researched and dishonest – so of course the advice it gives is bad.

    Seeking passion and meaning at work is the path to more career happiness and success and less stress and burnout. It’s also one way you can help create a better world, by making sure that all of your professional skill and energy is spent in the service of something that you can clearly see is making the world a better place, rather than in just obtaining a pay check or career advancement.

    I have to say, if you make your career choices with no consideration for where your passions lie, I honestly pity you.

    Related posts

     

  • Science: Happiness at work is good for employees AND the bottom line

    There has never been a stronger focus on happiness at work in organizations all over the world than there is right now.

    And this is no wonder: Happy workplaces are more profitable and innovative, attract the best employees and have lower absenteeism and employee turnover rates. Simply put, happy companies make more money.

    Also, happiness at work is great for employees making them more successful, healthier and happier in private life as well.

    But why exactly is that and what trends are driving so many workplaces to take happiness seriously?

    At our 2018 Happiness at Work Conference I gave talk on that question and you can watch the whole thing here and get all the ammunition you need to make the case for happiness in your workplace.

  • The meaning of life is happiness – just not your own

    A few weeks ago I got the opportunity to give a speech about a brand new (for me) topic: Why are we here, alive, in this universe? What’s the meaning of life? What is a good life and how do you get it?

    Based on lessons from philosophy, psychology and neuroscience, I make the claim that the purpose of life is happiness – just not your own. I also talk about how to apply that in our workplaces.

    Watch the speech and tell me if you agree :)

  • 11 government policies that promote happiness at work to give a country a competitive advantage

    11 government policies that promote happiness at work to give a country a competitive advantage

    Discussing public policy in Dubai

    Given that happy companies have significant competitive advantages, governments have a strong interest in enacting public policies that promote happiness at work in their country.

    But what exactly could a government do to achieve this?

    At the World Government Summit in Dubai earlier this month I was part of a panel that discussed how public policy could promote workplace happiness.

    We had  a fascinating and wide-ranging discussion and came up with many cool ideas. Some of these may seem radical or weird but many of them are already in place in countries around the world.

    Here are 11 ideas I would suggest:

    1: Regulate and inspect psychological workplace safety

    Pretty much every country has a government agency that sets requirements for physical workplace safety and sends out inspectors to visit e.g. factories and construction sites to make sure that the correct safety equipment is being used and that workers are following safety regulations.

    So why not do the same for psychological workplace safety?

    In the Scandinavian countries, this is actually in place. The Working Environment Authorities conduct inspections in cases where they suspect that working conditions are psychologically unsafe. They inspect things like:

    • Amount of work and time pressure
    • High emotional costs of labor
    • Bullying and sexual harassment
    • Contradictory or unclear work requirements

    If they find that the workplace is psychologically unsafe they can issue orders that the company must follow. In serious cases they can even issue fines.

    Breaking a leg because you trip over something at work is painful and can take a long time to heal. But make no mistake about it: being bullied by your boss or working under constant stress can affect your mental and physical health just as severely.

    Therefore it makes perfect sense to mandate standards for psychological workplace safety and inspect workplaces to make sure they’re followed.

    2: Regulate against permanent overwork

    In Denmark, we have laws protecting employees from permanent overwork. The result is that Danes tend to leave work at a reasonable hour most days, and they also get five to six weeks of vacation per year, several national holidays and up to a year of paid maternity/paternity leave. While the average American works 1,790 hours per year, the average Dane only works 1,450.

    Even Japan where the culture of overwork is so rampant that they have a word called karoshi that means death from overwork, is trying to enact similar laws:

    The law, introduced as a response to the social problem that has been serious since the late 1980s, makes it the state’s responsibility to take steps to prevent death from overwork. It calls on the government to study the situation of heavy workloads that impair the health of company workers and lead them to take their own life.

    Protecting employees from permanent overwork makes them happier and more productive.

    3: Mandate employee representation on board of directors

    Here’s another idea from Scandinavia – give employees representation on the board of directors:

    Employees in Danish companies employing 35 employees or more, are entitled to elect a number of representatives to the board of directors. The number elected by employees should correspond to half the number elected by those who own the company at the general meeting, and should be at least two.

    Crucially these employee representatives are not mere observers – they have all the same powers and responsibilities as the “regular” board members.

    This means that employees are informed about and have influence on major strategic decisions.

    4: Make government workplaces role models

    I would love to see governments take a leading role by making public sector workplaces among the best in the country.

    Sadly, the public sector usually has a bit of an inferiority complex. Since they usually can’t offer the same salaries, perks and incentives as private sector workplaces, they feel that they can’t be as good workplaces.

    However, it turns out that those factors matter very little for workplace happiness, as long as they’re fair. However, public sector workplaces have a huge potential for being happy because they can offer something that many private workplaces struggle to give their employees: Meaningful work.

    Public organizations almost by definition work for an important purpose. Schools educate children, hospitals heal the sick, city planners create better and more liveable cities – even the garbage men play a huge role in making people’s lives easier and better.

    By contrast, let’s say  you work in an ad agency. The end result of your hard work might be that some company somewhere sells a fraction more detergent. Is that really meaningful to you?

    If public sector workplaces would take the lead on offering their employees things like meaningful work, great leadership, good working conditions, work/life balance, professional development and employee empowerment they could serve as role models for all workplaces.

    5: Promote lifelong learning

    When a government makes education available cheap or free to its citizens, there is a much bigger chance that they get to realize their full potential and become happy at work.

    And this should not be limited to young people. Lifelong learning should make it easy and affordable for anyone to upgrade their skills so they can get different or more interesting work.

    6: Require companies to measure and report on employee happiness

    Pretty much all countries require strict financial reporting from companies.

    So why not require companies to measure and report on employee happiness?

    7: Require all government suppliers to be certified happy workplaces

    The government of any nation buys huge amounts of goods and services from private sector companies.

    No government should knowingly buy from a company that used slave labor or child labor or polluted the environment.

    So why not require that all government suppliers be good workplaces?

    8: Don’t hobble trade unions

    Trade unions have a somewhat mixed reputation and can fall victim to corruption or cronyism.

    However, on the whole it is clear from the research that collective bargaining is a powerful tool to improve working conditions not just for union members but for all workers in many areas including compensation, vacation time, maternity/paternity leave and workplace safety.

    Employers and lobbyists in some countries are trying to restrict unions, making it easier for employers to keep costs low. If a government protects workers’ rights to organize, the result is better working conditions and happier workplaces.

    9: Celebrate the best workplaces

    Several private companies conduct surveys to find the best workplaces in different countries, but these rankings are always limited to those workplaces that pay to be included. This limits their usefulness.

    So why not let the state publish a ranking of the best workplaces in the country?

    10: Make unemployment benefits widely available and liveable

    When unemployment benefits are too low to live on or too hard to obtain, employees are locked in to their jobs, because leaving a bad workplace could have disastrous financial consequences.

    However, when unemployment benefits support a decent standard of living and are available also to people who quit a job, getting away from a toxic workplace is much easier.

    11: Make bad workplaces and managers legally responsible for the harm they cause

    If a workplace is run in a way that systematically harms its employees mental health, causing stress and depression, it should be possible to hold the leadership of that company legally accountable.

    We already do this for workplaces that don’t live up to physical workplace safety regulations – serious violations can lead to fines or even jail time for the managers responsible.

    I think it makes perfect sense to do the same for companies or managers that harm their employees mental health.

    The point

    Any government has an interest in enacting public policies that strengthen the competitive advantage of companies in that country.

    However, this is often done by cutting corporate taxes, deregulation or corporate subsidies – none of which have much of a track record of success.

    If a government is truly serious about giving companies a sustained, strong competitive advantage, they should really focus on policies that create happier workplaces.

    This would not only be good for the companies and the employees, it would also be good for the national economy, as it would boost national productivity and reduce absenteeism, stress and related healthcare costs.

  • Shouldn’t your country have a happiness minister?


    The UAE’s minister for happiness opens the conference.

    I am back from Dubai where I spent 3 days at the World Government Summit along with 4,000 other delegates.

    One theme running through the entire event was how government policies can further the happiness of citizens. I was invited to participate as an expert in happiness at work.

    And the event was REALLY fascinating. They had many of the biggest names in the field come and speak, including Ed Diener, Sir Richard Layard, Jeffrey Sachs and the prime minister of Bhutan where they have been focusing the country’s development on happiness for the last 15-20 years.

    Here I am with Sir Richard Layard:

    The closing speakers were the economist Joseph Stiglitz and Elon Musk.

    I am hugely impressed with the scope of the event and also with the consistent focus on how governments can focus on the wellbeing of their citizens, rather than just on economic growth. I think this is a fascinating vision for the future of public policy making.

    And the two are not the same. It is entirely possible to create economic growth in a way that does not make people any happier. Here is a graph showing how GDP per capita grew consistently over a 30-year period in the UK while life satisfaction stayed flat:

    So shouldn’t your country have a happiness minister? I wish mine did!

  • Selling by giving

    PresentI was asked by Paul Thornton to contribute to a booklet he’s writing called How to Succeed in Today’s Business World. Paul wanted to know the best piece of business advice I’ve ever received.

    This is what I submitted:
    One day, quite by accident, I found an article on the internet by some crazy Lithuanian guy called Andrius Kulikauskas. As if his name wasn’t strange enough in itself, the article examines what it would mean to give everything away.

    The premise of the article was this:

    I accept the idea that I should give everything away.

    The challenge is to put this into practice. This is a design problem for personal life and social economy. We can venture attempts and draw experience from them.

    My intent is to clarify the problem and offer solutions, especially by documenting ideas that have proven helpful in giving everything away.

    This sparked the idea of selling through giving, and that has been the single most efficient and fun sales tool I have ever tried. In every single sales situation I face, I ask myself this question: What can I give?

    It’s clear that I can’t give everything away. I couldn’t make a living if I did.

    But I repeatedly and reliably find that the more I give away, the more I get back. That my sales results are directly proportional to my generosity.

    Not to mention the fact that approaching any situation with an intent to give is much more fulfilling, natural and fun, making “selling by giving” not only more efficient but also more – dare I say it – giving.

  • Quote

    QuoteYou can know the name of a bird in all the languages of the world, but when you’re finished, you’ll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird… So let’s look at the bird and see what it’s doing — that’s what counts. I learned very early the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something.
    – Richard Feynman

  • Dangerous ideas

    What is your dangerous idea?

    The brilliant minds of The Edge community have been pondering that question and have come up with no less than 117 essays.

    Here are a few of my favourites:
    Carolyn Porco: The greatest story ever told.

    At the heart of every scientific inquiry is a deep spiritual quest – to grasp, to know, to feel connected through an understanding of the secrets of the natural world, to have a sense of one’s part in the greater whole.

    And we don’t have one god, we have many of them. We find gods in the nucleus of every atom, in the structure of space/time, in the counter-intuitive mechanisms of electromagneticsm. What richness! What consummate beauty!

    These are reasons enough for jubilation … for riotous, unrestrained, exuberant merry-making.

    So what are we missing?

    Ceremony.

    We have no loving ministers, guiding and teaching the flocks in the ways of the ‘gods’. We have no fervent missionaries, no loyal apostles. And we lack the all-inclusive ecumenical embrace, the extended invitation to the unwashed masses. Alienation does not warm the heart; communion does.

    But what if? What if we appropriated the craft, the artistry, the methods of formal religion to get the message across? Imagine ‘Einstein’s Witnesses’ going door to door or TV evangelists passionately espousing the beauty of evolution.

    Could it work? Could we create institutions that filled the roles of religion but which were based on science rather than faith? That is one hell of a dangerous idea. Not to mention weird and wonderful.

    Philip Zimbardo: The banality of evil is matched by the banality of heroism

    This view implies that any of us could as easily become heroes as perpetrators of evil depending on how we are impacted by situational forces. We then want to discover how to limit, constrain, and prevent those situational and systemic forces that propel some of us toward social pathology.

    It is equally important for our society to foster the heroic imagination in our citizens by conveying the message that anyone is a hero-in-waiting who will be counted upon to do the right thing when the time comes to make the heroic decision to act to help or to act to prevent harm.

    This is a wonderful shift in thinking: Rather than thinking of people as potential nazis or executioners (common thinking has it, that under the right circumstances all of us could become either), think of people as potential heroes and foster that potential.

    Simon Baron-Cohen: A political system based on empathy

    What would it be like if our political chambers were based on the principles of empathizing? It is dangerous because it would mean a revolution in how we choose our politicians, how our political chambers govern, and how our politicians think and behave. We have never given such an alternative political process a chance. Might it be better and safer than what we currently have? Since empathy is about keeping in mind the thoughts and feelings of other people (not just your own), and being sensitive to another person’s thoughts and feelings (not just riding rough-shod over them), it is clearly incompatible with notions of “doing battle with the opposition” and “defeating the opposition” in order to win and hold on to power.

    Yes! I think more and more these days on how to create a better way of politics. This is an important insight.

    Also check out last year’s question: “What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove it?”

  • Quote

    So, I’m saying, “This I believe: I believe there is no God.”

    Having taken that step, it informs every moment of my life. I’m not greedy. I have love, blue skies, rainbows and Hallmark cards, and that has to be enough. It has to be enough, but it’s everything in the world and everything in the world is plenty for me. It seems just rude to beg the invisible for more. Just the love of my family that raised me and the family I’m raising now is enough that I don’t need heaven. I won the huge genetic lottery and I get joy every day.

    Believing there’s no God means I can’t really be forgiven except by kindness and faulty memories. That’s good; it makes me want to be more thoughtful. I have to try to treat people right the first time around.

    – Penn Jillette

    This I believe too. Read the rest of it here.

  • Quote

    Love, forgiveness, people often view as part of religion. But this is a mistake. These are true humanity, had at birth by all, while religion comes much later and is part of culture. They are different. Religious faith, utilized properly, strengthens these human values. Those who claim to be religious, but are without these values, are not truly religious.

    – Dalai Lama

    Via Pharyngula, an excellent blog mostly about evolution.