Category: Leadership

Leadership is an insanely important discipline. Here you’ll find the thought, tools and tricks of the trade of great leaders.

  • Webinar + slides: Leading With Happiness

    I just completed our latest webinar – this one is called Leading With Happiness – and  the video is live and available right here:

    It’s 30 minutes long. If you want my slides, get’em right here.

    We believe that there is a new style of leadership emerging – one that focuses more on doing what’s good for employees and customers than on short-term profits. A form of leadership, in short, that has happiness at its core.

    Topics:

    • What does happy leadership look like? How do you do it in practice?
    • How can managers themselves stay happy in their careers?
    • What are great examples of happy leaders?
    • Could it be that happy leaders ultimately create better results than traditional leaders?

    I mentioned Southwest Airlines as a great example of a workplace that practices this. Here’s a video where their former President Colleen Barrett explains their thinking:

    Our previous webinar was called “What REALLY makes us happy at work.” You can see it right here.

  • Some thoughts on why “empty labor” makes us miserable

    The Atlantic has an absolutely fascinating article that reveals how little work actually goes on at work.

    From the article:

    …the proportion of people who say they never work hard has long been far greater than those who say they always do. The articles and books about the stressed-out fraction of humanity can be counted in the thousands, but why has so little been written about this opposite extreme?

    And this:

    I talked with over 40 people who spent half of their working hours on private activities—a phenomenon I call “empty labor.” I wanted to know how they did it, and I wanted to know why. “Why” turned out to be the easy part: For most people, work simply sucks. We hate Mondays and we long for Fridays—it’s not a coincidence that evidence points towards a peak in cardiac mortality on Monday mornings.

    Read the whole thing – it’s great!

    Similarly, two Swiss consultants have defined the term boreout. They posit that you get burnout from having too much to do and boreout from a lack of meaningful tasks at work.

    If you’ve ever seen the movie Office Space, this is one of the things they get exactly right in this dialog between lay-off consultant Bob and IT employee Peter:

    Bob Slydell: You see, what we’re actually trying to do here is, we’re trying to get a feel for how people spend their day at work… so, if you would, would you walk us through a typical day, for you?
    Peter Gibbons: Well, I generally come in at least fifteen minutes late, ah, I use the side door – that way Lumbergh can’t see me, heh heh – and, uh, after that I just sorta space out for about an hour.
    Bob Porter: Da-uh? Space out?
    Peter Gibbons: Yeah, I just stare at my desk; but it looks like I’m working. I do that for probably another hour after lunch, too. I’d say in a given week I probably only do about fifteen minutes of real, actual, work.

    My sense is that this goes on in a lot of big workplaces, where there can be any number of tasks that don’t serve any meaningful purpose. Much effort instead goes into things like:

    • endless meetings
    • enforcing bureaucracy and red tape
    • writing and reading memos
    • internal politicking and backstabbing
    • activities intended only to CYA (Cover Your Ass).

    For me, this is a tragedy because above all else, what we crave at work is meaningful results, i.e. knowing that we make a difference at something that matters. Having to pretend that you’re contributing while knowing that your job is essentially meaningless is a recipe for stress.

    What we need to do instead is eliminate all work that is not meaningful and then work hard to make sure that each and every person in the organization:

    1. Are good at their jobs (i.e. what they do)
    2. Know that what they do is important (i.e. why they do it)

    This is a recipe for not only greater happiness at work but also for more energy, motivation and engagement.

  • 5 awesome corporate email policies

    5 awesome corporate email policies

    If you feel like email is stressing you out, there might be something to it. A study conducted at the University of California found that giving people uninterrupted time where they weren’t dealing with email generally made them less stressed and better able to focus:

    Without email, people multitasked less and had a longer task focus, as measured by a lower frequency of shifting between windows and a longer duration of time spent working in each computer window.

    Further, we directly measured stress using wearable heart rate monitors and found that stress, as measured by heart rate variability, was lower without email.

    This Fast Company article has a great overview of the findings. It’s a rather small study, so take it with a grain of salt, but it does support the sense that emails are a source of stress and distraction at work.

    Don’t get me wrong – I’m not against email. It’s an awesome communication tool, but in many workplaces it is used poorly, and mostly the burden has been put on employees to figure out strategies for dealing with the resulting email onslaught.

    I think it’s time for workplaces to take responsibility for this issue at a corporate level and fortunately, some workplaces have done just that and are trying new and better email policies.

    Here are the 5 best we’ve found.

    5: In France you can check out at 6pm

    French trade unions recently negotiated a deal for some of their members, which:

    …allows staff to shut down their phones and computers after 6 p.m. and not have to worry about checking in.

    Part of the deal is that companies can’t pressure or make their employees feel bad about not checking or responding to their email either.

    This is a good first approach to reduce the pressure to handle emails outside of working hours. While it can definitely help, it has the limitation that it puts full responsibility on employees to not check emails. Which is why I like the next one even better.

    4: Email not delivered after hours at Volkswagen

    VW made an agreement with the company’s work council to limit employees’ access to email on their Blackberry devices outside of working hours:

    Under the arrangement servers stop routing emails 30 minutes after the end of employees’ shifts, and then start again 30 minutes before they return to work.

    The staff can still use their devices to make calls and the rule does not apply to senior management.

    I really like this idea. Now it’s not up to employees to not check emails in their free time, email is just not delivered.

    3: Quiet Tuesdays at Intel

    Intel tried an experiment where 300 engineers and managers went “offline” every Tuesday morning.

    During these periods they had all set their email and IM clients to “offline”, forwarded their phones to voice mail, avoided setting up meetings, and isolated themselves from “visitors” by putting up a “Do not disturb” sign at their doorway.

    The purpose was to see the effect of 4 hours of contiguous “thinking time”.

    The experiment was a hit:

    It has been successful in improving employee effectiveness, efficiency and quality of life for numerous employees in diverse job roles. 45% of post-pilot survey respondents had found it effective as is, and 71% recommended we consider extending it to other groups, possibly after applying some modifications.

    However it’s telling that this experiment was conducted in 2008 and nothing’s changed inside Intel. It shows just how ingrained corporate attitudes to email are.

    2: Email not delivered during vacation time at Daimler

    One of the most insidious effects of email overload is that any longer stretches of time away from the office is punished immediately upon return, because your inbox will be full to overflowing. I haven’t seen any research on this, but I could easily imagine that this would subconsciously discourage people from taking vacations or at the very least increase stress around any time off.

    And that’s why this policy from Daimler is so awesome:

    The car and truck maker has implemented a new program that allows employees to set their email software to automatically delete incoming emails while they are on vacation.

    When an email is sent, the program, which is called “Mail on Holiday,” issues a reply to the sender that the person is out of the office and that the email will be deleted, while also offering the contact information of another employee for pressing matters.

    So you can go on vacation knowing that when you come back your inbox will contain the same number of emails as when you left.

    1: No internal emails at Menlo Innovations (and many others)

    US software company Menlo Innovations have ditched internal emails in favor of what they call “High-speed voice-activated technology.” Yes, if you want some information from a coworker, you’ll have to actually talk to that person.

    Several other companies have done something similar. Typically, employees can still receive emails from external sources like clients and vendors but there is no way to email colleagues.

    This makes a lot of sense considering all the great tools that can replace emails in many cases. We use Podio internally and it has seriously cut down on the number of internal emails we need to send. Others use Yammer or chat or even facebook.

    Update: Markus Schröter alerted me to another cool email policy:

    from now on, each Ferrari employee will only be able to send the same email to three people in-house.

     The upshot

    Email can be awesome. It can suck. It’s time for workplaces to create policies that address some of the problems and reduce the stress.

    Your take

    What’s your take on this? How is email affecting you? Which of the policies above would you like to see implemented in your workplaces? Know of any other great corporate email policies?

    Related posts

  • New rule

    New rule for managers: If the way you lead your employees makes them unhappy, you’re doing it wrong.

  • Leading with Happiness – Free Webinar December 3rd

    Kjerulf 7

    Update: Over 150 people have signed up already.

    We believe that there is a new style of leadership emerging – one that focuses more on doing what’s good for employees and customers than on short-term profits. A form of leadership, in short, that has happiness at its core.

    Join our free webinar on Wednesday December 3rd if you’d like to learn about:

    • What does happy leadership look like? How do you do it in practice?
    • How can managers themselves stay happy in their careers?
    • What are great examples of happy leaders?
    • Could it be that happy leaders ultimately create better results than traditional leaders?

    Date and time: Wednesday December 3rd at noon US East coast time / 9am pacific time / 5pm GMT / 6pm Central European time.

    Over 250 people signed up for our last webinar and just like that one, this one will be short (only 30 minutes) and punchy. We will get to the point quickly and leave you with new information and tools you can actually use.

    The webinar will be held live on our youtube channel, so there is no login needed and no software to install. If you can watch youtube, you can join. There will be a chance to ask questions via chat.

    Sign up for the webinar right here:






  • Hire great people and pay them fairly

    Container Store CEO Kip Tindell explains why his retail staff are paid significantly higher wages than what’s typical for the industry:

  • Some team members resist happiness. What would you do?

    OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

    I received the following email from a manager who reads my blog and I got his permission to post it here, to get input from all of you. What would you do?

    Here’s the email:

    I have a team of 10 people doing admin based work. The job can be busy but mundane and this can lower the “fun” factor within the team. I have introduced some nice changes to help their day go better as like you, my philosophy is enjoy coming to work and never be stressed about it.

    However, like everyone else I can get stressed but its not the workload, it’s the team that bring me down.

    Some ideas, I have introduced are:

    • Listening to music while they work
    • Be flexible with the shifts that they do
    • Let them have their moment where they need to walk away from an issue to calm down without any repercussions.

    I could go on and we do the team lunches and have events, but there will still be the people that I can’t make happy.

    The big issue I have is motivating all of the team. Some of my team are motivated and up for some fun or keen to get on board with a project but there will be a few that will put up the objection obstacles and flatly refuse to get involved, this can bring others down and ultimately put me down which really affects me.

    At times it makes me want to move jobs and try again with a new team.

    What would you do, as a manager in this situation? Please write a comment, I’d love to hear your thoughts.

  • How to greet your employees in the morning

    Two Danish bosses decided to greet their employees in a special way one Monday morning. Each employee got an energetic, friendly (and loud) greeting and a breakfast plate to take to their desk.

  • 5 things businesses should NEVER copy from sports – and 3 they should

    5 things businesses should NEVER copy from sports – and 3 they should

    Many companies look to sports for cues on motivations and performance and star athletes and coaches and make big bucks as corporate speakers. There is this unquestioned assumption that if you’re successful in sports, you can teach workplaces something that will make them more effective.

    I’d like to challenge that assumption :)

    In fact, I believe there are so many fundamental differences between running a business and (say) coaching a football team that it becomes almost impossible to transfer any principles or practices.

    Here are 5 things businesses should definitely not copy from sports:

    5: Abrasive coaches

    It seems like sports team coaches are given license to be complete jerks. They can throw tantrums, yell at referees, badmouth opposing players (or even their own players) in public – and be celebrated for all of this because it shows “passion”.

    Nobody wants that kind of behavior from their manager at work. Steve Ballmer tried this sort of thing as CEO of Microsoft and has been deservedly ridiculed for it.

    4: Adulation for star players
    Sports teams have a few stars and many supporting players. In a workplace you need everyone to perform at their best.

    3: Intense competition
    It’s a common belief that competition makes people perform better, but research shows that it’s actually the other way around – competition makes people achieve worse results.

    2: Rewards for results
    Athletes are almost always rewarded for results – win that tournament and there’s prize money. Again, research shows that bonuses in the workplace make people less productive on any task that requires creativity and independent thinking.

    1: Focus only on the next game
    In sports, the focus is often only on the next game. In business, you need to be able to think long-term and create success not just for this week but for years in the future.

    Each of those 5 practices are very common in sports but just don’t work in business.  That being said, there are a few practices in sports that businesses should absolutely emulate. Here are three:

    3: Make time for training
    Athletes spend many more hours training for matches than actually in matches. This gives them a chance to improve their skills and a risk-free environment where they can try out new approaches and plays and see how they work.

    In the workplace however, there is rarely a chance to try out new ideas without risking failure. Employees are always playing for points and never playing to learn.

    2: Celebrate success
    Athletes are very good at celebrating wins. They even celebrate partial progress towards a win when they score a goal or similar.

    In many workplaces, success is met with a shrug and wins are rarely celebrated.

    1: Include restitution
    Every successful athlete know that you get stronger by training and THEN RESTING. Without restitution, you’re actually just continually weakening yourself.

    Workplaces on the other hand consistently underestimate the need for restitution. Employees are worked hard constantly and breaks and time off work are seen as a necessary evil. In fact, employees are implicitly told that they can show “commitment” by giving up weekends and vacations and working more hours.

    There is no reason why we should try to follow the lead of athletes and coaches in our efforts to create better and more successful workplaces. Many of the practices from sports just won’t work in a workplace – you could even argue that many of them don’t even work that well in sports.

    And don’t even get me started on copying practices from the military :)

    Your take

    Has your company ever had a star coach or an athlete come in and speak? What did they say, that you found useful? What do you think workplaces should or shouldn’t copy from sports? Write a comment and let me know your take.

    Related posts

  • Why corporate values often have no value

    A CEO of a large Norwegian company once told me that “you know a corporate values program is doomed to fail, when they start distributing mouse mats with the values printed on them.”

    Many companies today have taken great pains to identify and communicate their core values, but often this kind of thing sinks below the surface like a stone, leaving very few ripples.

    In this short video that I shot for one of our clients a while back, I talk about what it takes to create corporate values that have value and I give a great example from one workplace that’s done so very successfully.